Imperial Administration in Han China and Imperial Rome

Analyze similarities and differences in techniques of imperial administration in TWO of the sideline pudding stones Han China (206 B. C. E. -220 C. E. ) Mauryan/Gupta India (320 B. C. E-550 C. E) regal capital of Italy (31 B. CE-476 C. E. ) While imperial administration in Han China from 206 B. C. E to 220 C. E. and Imperial Rome from 31 B. C. E. to 476 C. E. had their similarities like the family roles that the administration encourages, living under one ruler who kick downstairss the people some control, and the command idea of equalization, they also had their differences.One of these differences being in how each ruler gave their empire control and where they put themselves according to the rest of their empire. some(prenominal) Han China and Imperial Rome are controlled under one central leader. Both of these leaders give the citizens some form of control and contri barelyion to their empire. The difference is how they give the citizens power. In Imperial Rome, Augustus k eeps the reliable forms of the commonwealth such as the offices, honors, and privileges of the senatorial class as a base for his new restored Republic straightway called the Principate.In keeping the form of the Republic he still gives power to the Senate. In China, Gaozu kept the Qin Empire as his influence to keep choosing district officials to throw away some of his power. In addition, Augustus allow ins himself as an ordinary citizen. What he altered from the Republic to the Principate is the reality of power. He never called himself the emperor or dictator but called himself princeps meaning first among equals. Gaozu was called the emperor and didnt disagree in having crowning(prenominal) power.Instead, he equalized the rest of the people and just put himself on top. Both empires believed in generalization of the people, Augustus just took it a step farther by including himself. A major similarity in both Imperial Rome and Han China is the idea of having the leading role of the family the eldest male and the women having no place in political issues. In Later Han, families believed heavily in respect, obedience, and loyalty to the elder male of the family.In both empires, women stayed home to raise the children and do household chores while the men were soldiers, doing business, and discussing politics. Although women had no role in good proceedings, they still had a great influence on the males decisions. Women gained greater personal protection and economic freedom over a course of years and many influenced and helped shape history. In conclusion, I speak up the reason that Chinese emperors believed they were of ultimate power was because of the previous dynasties who thought the resembling thing.The Han Empire had previous influence from all the Chinese dynasties before it. On the otherwise hand, The Roman Empire was younger and might confirm seen that other empires werent happy with the emperor being the central control. Augustus might have taken this as influence to do something different and decided to include himself in the people. Overall, Imperial Rome and Han China are two very(prenominal) similar empires that have the same general idea of how they wanted their empires to be.