'B. F. Skinner and Albert Bandura\r'

'B. F mule driver came up with Skinner’s possibility of some unmatchableality. consort to the conjecture, differences in case-by-case sort atomic number 18 as a conclusion of different kinds of teaching experience different people encounter. Some of the expression pattern may be learned by direct experience (direct backing) musical composition others atomic number 18 by means of observational or sensational scholarship. Reinforcement plays a major companionable occasion in shaping the building of the learned look. Reinforcement perplexs three shapes. Direct funding involves social approval or disapproval and conspicuous rewards.Vicarious support involves observing some wholeness receive a reward or punishment for deportment like to his/her own deportment. Self administered reinforcement is whereby a person evaluates his/her own performance with ego honor or criticism (Zillman and Bryant 2001). Therefore, a given port in a specific situation will s tick on the likely result. According to Bandura social cognitive hypothesis, expressionism is ground on the concept that reading is cultured and is subjective to environmental accompanimentors.1). The theory ensnare more breed in the fact that environment, deportment and cognition work together and hence address important influence among each other (Travers 2001). In personality development, Albert Bandura came to a conclusion that environment causes behavior while on the other hand behavior causes environment. This factor led to Bandura’s idea of correlative determination and had a belief that an action of an single and the action of his environment are linked together. According to his theory, personality development comes as a result of relations between environment, psychological process and behavior of an several(prenominal)istic (Travers 2001).2). Discuss the similarities between each theoriser’s ideas of personality Theories by B. F Skinner and A lbert Bandura played a great situation in the environmentalist point of view of development. The two theories are similar in stating that the environment shape learning and the behavior of an individual from childhood point in time to maturity stage (Travers 2001). Both theories recognize the significance of reinforcement in learning and behavior. In both case, need is embedded and strengthened by the consequences and so one can easily learn if he/she set the consequences and in addition one can be reinforced vicariously.In both the theory, the individual is at the center stage of determining his/her behavior. In skinner theory, self administered reinforcement play a major role in self criticism or honor and so he/she can decide on what behavior to adopt without influence from another party. This fact is the very(prenominal) as in Albert Bandura theory of personality where an individual has self regulatory mechanism which provide for the potentiality for self directed chang e and for the capability of one influencing his own behavior (Zillman and Bryant 2001). This is inclined to self observation, self decision and self-reaction.3) Discuss the differences between the theorists’ ideas of personality (include each reasoning for the differencesâ€personal history B. F. Skinner theory of personality differ with Albert Bandura social cognitive theory in that it specified that a behavior was precisely as a reaction of environmental stimuli while social cognitive theory state that behavior of an individual can be modified by external stimuli while putting into consideration the fact that learning can take place finished copying. Albert Bandura also state that learning also take a cognitive perspective.Skinner theory of personality provides style for operant conditioning while Bandura social cognitive theory does not. In Skinner theory of personality, the behavior is influenced by the environment and it is a one flair tier while in Albert Bandura social cognitive theory, the behavior of an individual is influenced by the environment while at the same time, the environment is influenced by the individual behavior and so it is a two mood tier. 4) Discuss each theorist’s ideas concerning the role of society in the development of personality and either developmental stagesAlbert Bandura’s idea about the role of society concerning the development of personality and any developmental stage in cognitivism, behavior is guided by cognitions about the world. The cognitive theories are personality theories which stress on cognitive processes like thinking and crack judgment. Bandura’s theory further draws the importance of molding through the social cognitive theory, in that as a result of direct training of an individual in the society or conditioning (for precedent through reinforcement a child is subjected to such(prenominal) as punishment) models behavior hence development of personality (Travers 2001).T hrough the influence of the society, an individual learns several issues from childhood which back up in development of personality. Through this idea of social learning, the role played by role models in development of personality becomes very significant. B. F. Skinner also gives a perspective of personality development that is based on learning through others in the society.Skinner (Quoted in Travers 2001: 156) also further notes that the adolescent stage of gracious development requires that the positive behaviors exhibited by the adolescents since adolescents are more vigorous in repeating the behavior for which they consider obtained reinforcement.Reference List: Travers, F. , John, (2001). â€Å"Human growth and development through the lifespan” Jones & Bartlett Publishers Zillman, D. and Bryant, J. (2001). â€Å"Media effects: Advances in theory and research 2nd Edition,” NJ Lawrence Erlbaum; Hillsdale: <http://www. fca. pucminas. br/saogabriel/raop/p df/social_cognitive_theory. pdf. >\r\n'