Programming Language Paradigms

PROGRAMMING PARADIGMSProgramming imagesProgramming images - Approaching the Limits of ImaginationTeresa M . ClarkProgramming linguistic communications CSE 3302 backfire 2007The early computers were programmed wholly in machine code . This was some(prenominal) error given up and monotonous (Sebesta 1996 ,.39 . The need for higher(prenominal) aim schedule voice communications was realised very early . By 1965 the startle versions of FORTRAN , COBOL , ALGOL , and LISP had been certain (Sebesta 1996 ,. 37 . Programs written preliminary to 1970 suffered from poor readability , the nimiety of GOTO statements , and the lack of top level scheduling style (Sebesta 1996 ,. 12In the 1970 s the coordinate Programming revolution took started The motif of structured programming was to disclose programs using a govern fig ure that featured top-down structure and a stripped use of GOTO statements . This provided for easier reading , high-speed debugging and greater portability (Sebesta 1996 ,. 12 in that respect atomic number 18 now several(prenominal) unlike programming range of a functions . These were developed to meet the needs of singular programming industriousnesss there are some(prenominal) common factors in all(prenominal) of these paradigms . There cannot be a one-shoe-fits-all schema . Each paradigm has it infrangible and weak points . Each also has areas where it works advantageously and those where it does not . It is preferable to have a tool disaster of programming paradigms to select from . This is analogous to a tool cut that a carpenter might use consisting of a dog pound , a screw device driver , a level , and a maxim . Each of these tools is well conform to for different tasks . Attempting to cut a piece of wood with a pound sign and screw driver may be p ossible merely using the precept would be ! idealWe will introduce cardinal paradigms in this try on , including the already mentioned structured programming . The others are the Object lie image , Functional Paradigm , Logical Paradigm , Language Oriented Paradigm , inquisition Oriented Paradigm and indispensable Language Oriented Paradigm . We shall briefly describe to each one of these paradigms , compare and credit line them with each other , introduce an application that would be suited for each , and point out some programming language principals that may apply to each paradigmThe geomorphological Programming Paradigm is an abstraction of computing that is ground on the Turing and von Neumann machines . This paradigm provides commands and control structures to manipulate data that is stored in memory . In structural programming , a pee-pee may depute one value and later reassigned to another(prenominal) value . Program operation consists of a sequence of states and the transition from one state to th e adjacent is determined by denomination of variables and control structuresStructured programming is snatch on procedures . These are modules that are generally divided based on their functions . The data is unplowed separate from these procedures . This paradigm was sluttish to accept because it closely mapped to the von Neumann and Turing Machines . As noted preceding(prenominal) , one of the major contributions of the structural Programming Paradigm is the removal of the use of the GOTO statement The proposal of marriage for its removal was first presented to the editor of the ACM in 1968 (Dijkstra 1968...If you want to absorb a secure essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper