Chapter 2- Section 1: Imperial Conflicts and Rival Colonial Models The Spanish and the French differed because the Spanish forced the Indians to covert to universality and to motor a crap digging flamboyant and commonwealth for ample estates. As it declared on scallywag 40, In Mesoamerica the Spanish colonial political science forced the Indians to convert to universality and to work digging gold and agriculture large estates. In contrast the French didnt really bother the natives. As it stated on foliate 40, In the Fur-Trading empires created by the French and the Dutch, the native people kept up(p) their lands and political autonomy The Spanish, French, Dutch, and side pursued contrasting methods of liquidation because each had a unalike belief system. For example the Spanish believed it was best if they converted the Indians to Catholicism and put them to work. The French and the Dutch didnt bother the natives as much because they were to a greater extent center on trading with the natives for their fur pellets.
As it was stated on scallywag 40, Despite the differing goals of these colonial regimes- the exploration of native push stick out by the Spanish, the trading of furs by the French and the Dutch, the creation of farming communities by the English The New World was important to the European government because they seen it as a way to acquire to a greater extent land, gold and other riches. As stated on varlet 39, Although the risks were great and the rewards uncertain, tens of thousands of Europeans crossed the Atlantic during the seventeenth century, driven by poverty and prosecution at home or skeletal by the lur! es of the New World: land, gold, and- as another puritan migrant put it- the hope of propagating the Gospel to these poor condemnable people.
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment