Was Frederick II Anti-Papal?
There were three great frauds in history. Moses, deliverer and Mohammed.
Frederick II.
All religions must be tolerated...for...every man must get to heaven in his proclaim way.
Frederick II
Frederick II was perhaps one of the close influential individuals of the period, both(prenominal) for his open secularity - which was highly unusual for his eon - and for his quite blatant moves for change within the Empire and what this achieved. Was he anti-papal? It would seem that he indeed was, however history would retell us that this perceived anti church stance was rigorously a result of its own ambitions for power in the Empire, which lay it directly in the way of Fredericks semipolitical and religious reforms which acquire him his nickname of Stupor Mundi - The Wonder of The World. However, there is also rise to suggest that Frederick was deliberately manipulating Western European politics to erupt the position of the Church, as well as a misfortune that it was actually Innocent IIIs mistake to have placed Frederick amid the Hammer (Germany) and Anvil (South of Italy, or Two Sicilies) which had caused Frederick to take plastered actions and earn himself the anti-papal title.
Only Fredericks policies, when carefully examined have the potential of solving the closed book of his attitude towards the Papacy.
Fredericks problem from the very beginning were his unfortunate family root which consisted of a Sicilian mother, and a German father which would allot Frederick II to essentially extend control over both sides of the empire, granting him not only immense power, but leaving the papacy authority in Rome in between - which could be crushed at any time. Purely due to Innocents own fault, Frederick was crowned German king in 1212, after the Popes political manipulations caused Otto of Brunswick...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment