Looking at the statistics from Source G on that point is a definite increase in the number of illegal stills seized and a outsize increase in the number of gallons of spirit seized. Source H shows acts of associated with drunkenness. At first sight these two sources appear to show that prohibition was working. The guard were managing to seize large numbers of stills and spirit, and more arrests for drink related offences were on the increase. The government were determined to make prohibition work.
However, to a large cover up the figures in the two sources do show that prohibition was non successful. The public were producing more and more alcohol as a result of the restrictions placed on them. Prohibition went against the previously original way of life and restricting this only helped to push the work and drinking of alcohol underground.
People became very clever at finding ways to obtain recipes for producing their own alcohol and the 25% increase in illegal stills seized by the government proves this. If the police were doing their bank line properly, the figures should be decreasing not increasing. They would not be seizing more illegal stills than before. Despite the consequences, Americans enjoyed drinking and were will to take the risk of arrest to carry on doing something they had previously done with no punishment. The number of people breaking the law of nature made it increasingly difficult for the police to do their job effectively and catch the law-breakers.
The figures in both sources show that no matter what the police did, outlawing alcohol was never going to bring home the bacon as too...If you want to get a full essay, stray it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment