Julius Lester has never prove The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. This is important because he makes arguments with direct quotes taken from the book. While his rudimentary motivation is a just one, his arguments are ill informed, and his expression reflects his little understanding of the story. He starts his argument as a race issue. As a obscure parent, however, I sympathize with those who want the book banned⦠(Lester 103).

But he later attacks the book for mere fleck holes, such as when he states If Jim knew that the Ohio met the Mississippi at Cairo, how could he not have know of the closer proximity to freedom to the east in Illinois or north in Iowa? (104). Lester then goes on to state, rather than those plot holes being a convenient way to keep the story where Twain wanted it, that Jims ignorance of suckh knowledge is demeaning to black mountain because ist painted Jim as a fool. He is right somewhat Jim, though, for the wrong reason. Jim was superstitious, and at times, foolish, but he more than make up for it in kindness shown to Huck and others, making him a moral and good character. Twain does not depict the black race as being intellectually inferior; he merely portrays one black man as foolish, which is not enough information for any reader to...If you want to loll a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment