Islam
Did the Quran or the sword accomplish the spread of Islam throughout the man? To me, the answer is obvious. It grew through the power of the Quran, but to many the doubts atomic number 18 beginning to creep into their minds. After the events of September 11th, the media has been using jehad as a replacement for the word sc atomic number 18ist act. However, the people take up no idea that the word Jihad is completely distinct than the word terrorism.
Jihad, a holy war, when this word is heard, terrorism is a synonym which first comes to mind. So, what does the word Jihad truly misbegot? According to many Islamic Scholars, Jihad actually does non mean a holy war, it really means; to exploit ones utmost to control ones testify bad desires and intentions. This is the real Jihad, which is relate with establishing Maruf (right) and removing Munkar (evil) from our lives and from society. This demands the hold of any means to extend to this goal, and in somewhat circumstances even give our life for the cause of Islam. Still, this does not give the green light to kill innocent people, which is a punishable sin.
In addition to understanding Jihad we now should try out the other side, terrorism. A major problem in discussing terrorism is establishing a definition. terrorist act can be described as the unlawful use of fear or force to achieve certain political, economical, or social aims. This definition is not anyplace near the same as the definition of Jihad. The use of terror to achieve goals is not a new idea in history it has been happening for years and even centuries. Modern Terrorism still has some elements of terrorism from the past. However today, terrorism poses a threat to innocent people, and is a serious threat to democratic...
--
References
-->its a good essay but I think the championship should be changed and I think you should have put in more ayats from the quran. Like you could have an ayat from the quran that talks round jihad
I quite agree with the writer that the Islam, specifically Jihad is being misinterpreted in the west being equal to Terrorism.
Can anyone bit for their rights become terrorist? When the people are oppressed on their own land and fight against oppressors, can they still be called terrorist? When a mans land is occupied, killing tens of thousands of people, can this poor man be called a terrorist if he takes arms against these killers?
Terrorism has no clear meaning. and it seems some of the countries do not expect to define it. The stronger and influencial countries use it as a mean to fight there opponents which are technologically inferior and less armed.
Therefore terrorism is reasonable a tool of those big and influencial countries to promote their own agenders.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment